A Not Uncommon Carolina Tale

Posted: March 13, 2012 in Uncategorized

Old hat by now in the Palmetto State, a recent corruption scandal has plagued the South Carolina campaign process as former Lt. Governor Ken Ard stepped down from his post before pleading guilty to seven counts of illegal campaign finance manipulation late last week. He’s been replaced by former Senate President Pro Tempore, Glenn McConnell, who will have headway to make in saving face for the state GOP in the coming weeks and months. Indeed, the party acknowledges that Ard’s indictment has been a long time coming, as investigations date back to mid-summer last year.

State prosecutors noted that Ard laundered his own money through associates to then make illegal contributions back to his 2010 Lt. Governor bid, “netting” $87,000 in nonexistent contributions in early 2009 as other candidates such as Orangeburg attorney Bill Connor were fighting for Big Whig donors around the state. Says fundraising expert and BGW affiliate in the state Bob Wislinski, “an important part of any campaign early on is securing a stranglehold on the perception that you’re out-fundraising your opponents – which then enables you to actually do so.” That Ard had falsified his campaign’s financing created the illusion that he was the winning ticket, thus encouraging subsequent donors to get behind his bid. Among his various financing follies, the former LG also used misappropriated campaign funds for personal purchases like tickets, airfare, clothing, and various other expenses.

But we’ll move past this, SC. We will. We always do. A head held high in the South and a personal pride in kindness, generosity and good faith are the essence of our genteel hospitality and charm. And that trickles on down to our morality and our sense of justice in governance, yes?

Not if morality and justice are analogs of ethics. And not if we’ve seen nearly ten direct – and major – public ethics violations, be they prosecuted or not, in just the past decade. A brief survey of a recent The State article recounts our ethical celebrity. From Sharpe to Ravenel to Viers (still in office), legislative misplay is rife. Circle in the current and past Governors’ personal life questions and the legacy of Strom Thurmond’s hypocritical bigotry and we’ve got a three-ringed circus. Oh wait, lest we forget the “You lie!” incident. There’s hardly a better background for using the oft-trending Twitter term, “SMH,” as a result. In fact, I’ve found myself shaking my head many, many times over the past ten years.

All this said, as a SC native and currently being back and forth between South Carolina’s capital and our nation’s capital, I’ve found myself sticking to, “I’m from Carolina” in introduction, rather than meddling in the prejudgment that would follow any further specificity. And so, one day recently I got to wondering, “Why the heck does this happen in our state? And what do we do fix it?” Its corruptibility is almost predictable at this point – it really is. But there really hadn’t been a reasonable explanation until I recently read a great analysis in The Atlantic.

Titled, “South Carolina and the Perils of Single-Party Governance,” the article points to what should’ve been so clear all along: we lack the diversity in worldview needed to secure a built-in political check and balance. That it’s a given that GOP-ers will win seats means that the party can put forward unimpressive candidates and still beat Dems. And so with less impressive candidates goes less impressive ethics. It’s no wonder we see a scandal-a-year when we’re plopping out people to run our Agriculture Department who participate in cockfighting. Nothing like someone who knows how to torture and perpetuate cruelty to livestock running an agricultural office! How insanely ridiculous. What we need is some more ideological – and so with that, cultural – diversity to widen SC’s breadth of ideas.

But therein lies the problem: the state’s current melting pot of ideas is that of a flavorless borscht. You wouldn’t wish it on any culinary palette. With that being said, I charge that we do, in fact, have potential. It exists out there in the ideo-stratosphere: there are forward-thinking thoughts in this state to be had. They are largely untapped and underused. See recent big-biz efforts to muddy green ideas in the state. And a GOP governor vetoing port legislation that will advance business and outside imports. Enacting these simple ideas brings progress. And they represent it too. But we have to overcome those ideologues who bludgeon progress – both red and blue.

By starting with the incorporation of new-age ideas – yes, acting like we’re in the 21st century – even the South can begin to slowly but surely turn its head forward. It’s up to my generation to recognize these needs. It matters naught that I lean moderately left personally (but support candidates, not parties); this is just as important for my generation’s Right in ensuring their candidates and future hold as much ethical ground as their own party leaders would want – and vice versa on the other side of the aisle. Indeed, a brave concept emerges that’s not a new one: just as our forefathers before us recognized, diversity in belief leads to the most justice in action.


  1. FlyOnTheWall says:

    I guess if the democrats could ever secure enough votes to secure office in SC, then they might have a chance of being unethical also.

    Though I see the benefit of having a diverse group of thinkers in office, I don’t see that as a hindrance to ethics violations. If arguing that electing more Democrats into SC politics will halt or deter political gaming, seemingly a white knight comes galloping in, I’d urge people to check out the SC Democrat Party’s Golden Boy, Rep. Jim Clyburn, first. In 2006 House Majority Whip-elect Rep. Clyburn vowed to exercise better leadership in Congress and raise ethical standards, only a year later to vote, as one of only 26 nayes, against a resolution to force ethics committee action on Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) after his indictment on charges that include racketeering, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.

    By alluding that the SC Republican Party does not consider morality and justice analogous to ethics, and seemingly arguing that SC Democrats DO, you are attracting people to vote D. The other argument about having diversity in leadership, while admirable, does not tie into your original intent or lead. If the golden boy himself and de facto grandfather of the modern day SC Democrat Party, Jim Clyburn, is any preview of what his party has in store for our State, then I’ll politely keep putting emphasis on Republicans when I vote.

    • BGWsolutions says:

      Thanks for your comments. And we encourage all others! First, while as the writer I’m a Dem., not all commentary at BGW will nor should reflect that left-leaning concepts are those that are necessarily the best. Every issue deserves, and improves from, the consideration of multiple opinions — this, in fact, is the point of the above piece. Surely though, and to your first point, at the rate in which the state GOP is choosing its leaders these days, the party may cede political ground to the left in other important races (see the new CD-7, where it could be a tight race).

      Secondly, you’re right: ethics violations will surely persist. Misplaced principles or ethical violations aren’t the direct result of a lack of variety in thought. But they are certainly made easier and fueled by it when candidates aren’t having to prove themselves beyond mere party affiliation from the start — again the point herein. And I think that proactive and progressive new-ranging ideas such as green economics will provoke and expand new thought, which would, in turn, force the normalcy of the SC political mold outside of its current insularity.

      I don’t think that SC GOP-ers are in any way fundamentally unethical. That wasn’t my intention. I’m saying the level of GOP corruption in the state is alarming. And it’s been a charge to the GOP voters to correct for this issue. The problem is that ain’t happening, hence the need for more outside pressure in the form of new ideas and actual competitors to do so.

      I don’t find your final points of Rep. Clyburn’s political discretion to be applicable to the argument nor evidence of his lack of ethics. First, to the latter concern, as I recall the vote was because the Member at question had yet to be found guilty. More importantly, a lawmaker’s opinion on another lawmaker’s transgressions isn’t the same as directly defying the law. He’s not done anything illegal, nor has his ethical reputation ever been at question — by either party. In fact, he resides in a Congressional leadership office for the reason of his leadership repertoire: one that is to be admired by either party in the state that he represents, as he does so as a leader nationwide.

      But that subject is less applicable to the debate at hand. The argument is that the lack of political diversity in the state breeds GOP complacency in making sure leaders are ethical because they don’t have to be in order to get elected. And, actually, your pinning Clyburn as the SC D’s hero better makes my point: he’s the one Member of Congress in the state in a leadership office, has been in office for 20-plus years, and is well-respected nationally. If anything, he’s prototype of a state minority party choosing an ethical, respected leader because they are forced to out of competition. And, to bring it full circle, that I believe the GOP’s lawmaker-choosing has been negligent is secondary to the fact that newer, progressive ideas would certainly open up the political array of thought — and that, my friend, would guarantee that SC GOP kingmakers are better prepared for an on-their-toes decision-making process prior to choosing the next Ken Ard.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s